Not sure where to start?

A five-day Health Check

Fixed price. One honest report on your org, ranked by cost and risk. Yours to keep whether or not you hire us.

Request a Health Check

Selected work

Quotes from six days to four hours

How a components manufacturer moved tacit pricing rules out of one person’s head and into CPQ.

Read the case study

Enquiry response from 3 days to 4 hours, and a 19% lift in application conversion

<strong>Illustrative example.</strong> This engagement is fictional and exists to show format and tone. Replace it with a real case study, with written client permission, or relabel this section before publishing.

Headline: Enquiry response from 3 days to 4 hours, and a 19% lift in application conversion At a glance: Higher education institution · 14,000 students · Sales Cloud + Experience Cloud + SIS integration · 20 weeks

The problem

Enquiries arrived into departmental inboxes and were answered when someone had time — a median of just over three days in a market where competitor institutions responded same-day. Nobody could report on enquiry volume by course, because there was no shared record.

The wider problem was the fragmentation of the relationship. Recruitment, admissions, student services and alumni each held their own system, so a graduate’s history restarted three times.

What we found

  • 11 departmental inboxes handling enquiries with no SLA and no shared visibility.
  • Median first response 3.2 days; 14% of enquiries never received one.
  • Applicant records recreated at each stage; no linkage from enquiry to enrolment.
  • Student-success signals (attendance, engagement, support contacts) in three systems, unreviewed until failure.
  • Alumni contact data 41% stale.

Lifelong constituent model where one person carries roles over time · Central enquiry capture with routing, SLA and escalation · Applicant portal with status visibility and document upload · SIS integration contract defining field ownership at each lifecycle stage · Early-alert case management combining attendance, engagement and support signals · Alumni engagement with self-service contact update.

01 · Weeks 1–3 — Lifecycle mapping and role model design. 02 · Weeks 4–6 — Enquiry capture, routing and SLA build; deployed early as a standalone win. 03 · Weeks 7–11 — SIS integration contract and build. 04 · Weeks 12–15 — Applicant portal. 05 · Weeks 16–18 — Early-alert case management with student services. 06 · Weeks 19–20 — Alumni module, training and launch ahead of the recruitment cycle.

Results (first full recruitment cycle)

MetricBeforeAfter
Median first response to enquiry3.2 days4.1 hours
Enquiries with no response14%0.4%
Enquiry-to-application conversionbaseline+19%
Early-alert cases raised before failure point12%58%
Alumni records with verified contact details59%87%

What we’d do differently

Deploying enquiry routing in week six was the best decision in the project — it built credibility that carried the harder integration work. We’d now design every long programme with a deliberate visible win in the first six weeks.

Start here

Tell us what your CRM is getting wrong

Thirty minutes with a consultant, not a salesperson. You’ll leave the call with at least one thing you can fix yourself — whether or not you hire us.

Prefer email? hello@zeptglobal.com · Typical reply time: one business day